
Late at night, someone broke into a jewelry shop. The security camera showed the culprit entering through the back door. The time display on the footage read 2:17 a.m.
But it was found later that this camera’s clock was 7 minutes ahead of the real time.
The four suspects’ alibis are as follows.
Who has no alibi at the actual time of the break-in?
If you get stuck, open the hints one at a time, in order.
Is the camera’s clock ahead of or behind the real time?
What is 2:17 on the footage in real time?
Who has no alibi at that time?
Who has no alibi at the actual time of the break-in?
Choose the answer closest to the truth.
Ueno
The answer is Ueno.
The camera is 7 minutes fast, so 2:17 on the footage is really 2:10. At that time, Akaishi (2:05-2:20), Ito (2:00-2:12) and Endo (1:30-2:30) have alibis. Ueno’s alibi starts at 2:15, so he has no alibi at 2:10.
If you used the footage time (2:17) as it is, only Ito would lose his alibi, and Ito would look like the culprit. Correcting the clock offset is the key.
When a time is displayed on the footage, it is easy to assume "this is the correct time."
The cases on this site are fictional puzzles created for entertainment. Any resemblance to real people, organizations or events is coincidental.
© Unsolved Files